ISO-IEC-27001-LEAD-AUDITOR RELIABLE TEST GUIDE - EXAM ISO-IEC-27001-LEAD-AUDITOR PDF

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Reliable Test Guide - Exam ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor PDF

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Reliable Test Guide - Exam ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor PDF

Blog Article

Tags: ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Reliable Test Guide, Exam ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor PDF, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Dumps Download, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor New Real Exam, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Engine

As you see, all of the three versions are helpful for you to get the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor certification: the PDF, Software and APP online. So there is another choice for you to purchase the comprehensive version which contains all the three formats, it is the Value Pack. Besides, the price for the Value Pack is quite favorable. And no matter which format of ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor study engine you choose, we will give you 24/7 online service and one year's free updates on the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor practice questions.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor (PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor) Certification Exam is a professional certification program designed for individuals who want to demonstrate their expertise in auditing information security management systems (ISMS) based on the ISO/IEC 27001 standard. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification exam is offered by the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), a global provider of training, examination, and certification services for professionals in the field of information security, quality management, and other related areas.

>> ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Reliable Test Guide <<

Exam PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor PDF & ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Dumps Download

All knowledge contained in our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Practice Engine is correct. Our workers have checked for many times. Also, we will accept annual inspection of our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam simulation from authority. The results show that our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor study materials completely have no problem. Our company is rated as outstanding enterprise. And at the same time, our website have became a famous brand in the market. We also find that a lot of the fake websites are imitating our website, so you have to be careful.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam Sample Questions (Q114-Q119):

NEW QUESTION # 114
CMM stands for?

  • A. Capacity Maturity Matrix
  • B. Capability Maturity Model
  • C. Capability Maturity Matrix
  • D. Capable Mature Model

Answer: B


NEW QUESTION # 115
Scenario 6: Cyber ACrypt is a cybersecurity company that provides endpoint protection by offering anti-malware and device security, asset life cycle management, and device encryption. To validate its ISMS against ISO/IEC 27001 and demonstrate its commitment to cybersecurity excellence, the company underwent a meticulous audit process led by John, the appointed audit team leader.
Upon accepting the audit mandate, John promptly organized a meeting to outline the audit plan and team roles This phase was crucial for aligning the team with the audit's objectives and scope However, the initial presentation to Cyber ACrypt's staff revealed a significant gap in understanding the audit's scope and objectives, indicating potential readiness challenges within the company As the stage 1 audit commenced, the team prepared for on-site activities. They reviewed Cyber ACrypt's documented information, including the information security policy and operational procedures ensuring each piece conformed to and was standardized in format with author identification, production date, version number, and approval date Additionally, the audit team ensured that each document contained the information required by the respective clause of the standard This phase revealed that a detailed audit of the documentation describing task execution was unnecessary, streamlining the process and focusing the team's efforts on critical areas During the phase of conducting on-site activities, the team evaluated management responsibility for the Cyber Acrypt's policies This thorough examination aimed to ascertain continual improvement and adherence to ISMS requirements Subsequently, in the document, the stage 1 audit outputs phase, the audit team meticulously documented their findings, underscoring their conclusions regarding the fulfillment of the stage 1 objectives. This documentation was vital for the audit team and Cyber ACrypt to understand the preliminary audit outcomes and areas requiring attention.
The audit team also decided to conduct interviews with key interested parties. This decision was motivated by the objective of collecting robust audit evidence to validate the management system's compliance with ISO/IEC 27001 requirements. Engaging with interested parties across various levels of Cyber ACrypt provided the audit team with invaluable perspectives and an understanding of the ISMS's implementation and effectiveness.
The stage 1 audit report unveiled critical areas of concern. The Statement of Applicability (SoA) and the ISMS policy were found to be lacking in several respects, including insufficient risk assessment, inadequate access controls, and lack of regular policy reviews. This prompted Cyber ACrypt to take immediate action to address these shortcomings. Their prompt response and modifications to the strategic documents reflected a strong commitment to achieving compliance.
The technical expertise introduced to bridge the audit team's cybersecurity knowledge gap played a pivotal role in identifying shortcomings in the risk assessment methodology and reviewing network architecture. This included evaluating firewalls, intrusion detection and prevention systems, and other network security measures, as well as assessing how Cyber ACrypt detects, responds to, and recovers from external and internal threats. Under John's supervision, the technical expert communicated the audit findings to the representatives of Cyber ACrypt. However, the audit team observed that the expert s objectivity might have been compromised due to receiving consultancy fees from the auditee. Considering the behavior of the technical expert during the audit, the audit team leader decided to discuss this concern with the certification body.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Which activity was NOT conducted correctly by the audit team during the Stage 1 audit?

  • A. Conducting on-site activities by evaluating management responsibility for Cyber ACrypt's policies
  • B. Documenting the Stage 1 audit outputs by failing to include the relevant evidence or supporting documentation
  • C. Preparing for on-site activities by including the information security policy and operational procedures for review

Answer: B

Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth
C . Correct Answer:
The audit team documented findings, but the scenario does not confirm whether sufficient supporting evidence was included.
ISO 19011:2018 requires audit findings to be properly documented and justified with evidence.
Failing to document evidence reduces audit credibility.
A . Incorrect:
Preparing for the audit by reviewing policies and procedures is correct practice.
B . Incorrect:
Evaluating management responsibility for ISMS compliance is a required step in Stage 1.
Relevant Standard Reference:
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Clause 9.2 (Internal Audit)


NEW QUESTION # 116
Scenario 9: UpNet, a networking company, has been certified against ISO/IEC 27001. It provides network security, virtualization, cloud computing, network hardware, network management software, and networking technologies.
The company's recognition has increased drastically since gaining ISO/IEC 27001 certification. The certification confirmed the maturity of UpNefs operations and its compliance with a widely recognized and accepted standard.
But not everything ended after the certification. UpNet continually reviewed and enhanced its security controls and the overall effectiveness and efficiency of the ISMS by conducting internal audits. The top management was not willing to employ a full-time team of internal auditors, so they decided to outsource the internal audit function. This form of internal audits ensured independence, objectivity, and that they had an advisory role about the continual improvement of the ISMS.
Not long after the initial certification audit, the company created a new department specialized in data and storage products. They offered routers and switches optimized for data centers and software-based networking devices, such as network virtualization and network security appliances. This caused changes to the operations of the other departments already covered in the ISMS certification scope.
Therefore. UpNet initiated a risk assessment process and an internal audit. Following the internal audit result, the company confirmed the effectiveness and efficiency of the existing and new processes and controls.
The top management decided to include the new department in the certification scope since it complies with ISO/IEC 27001 requirements. UpNet announced that it is ISO/IEC 27001 certified and the certification scope encompasses the whole company.
One year after the initial certification audit, the certification body conducted another audit of UpNefs ISMS. This audit aimed to determine the UpNefs ISMS fulfillment of specified ISO/IEC 27001 requirements and ensure that the ISMS is being continually improved. The audit team confirmed that the certified ISMS continues to fulfill the requirements of the standard. Nonetheless, the new department caused a significant impact on governing the management system. Moreover, the certification body was not informed about any changes. Thus, the UpNefs certification was suspended.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
What type of audit is illustrated in the last paragraph of scenario 9?

  • A. Internal audit
  • B. Surveillance audit
  • C. Recertification audit

Answer: B


NEW QUESTION # 117
The data center at which you work is currently seeking ISO/IEC27001:2022 certification. In preparation for your initial certification visit a number of internal audits have been carried out by a colleague working at another data centre within your Group. They secured their ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certificate earlier in the year.
You have just qualified as an Internal ISMS auditor and your manager has asked you to review the audit process and audit findings as a final check before the external Certrfication Body arrives.
Which six of the following would cause you concern in respect of conformity to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 requirements?

  • A. The audit programme does not reference audit methods or audit responsibilities
  • B. The audit programme does not take into account the results of previous audits
  • C. The audit programme shows management reviews taking place at irregular intervals during the year
  • D. The audit process states the results of audits will be made available to 'relevant' managers, not top management
  • E. Audit reports are not held in hardcopy (i.e. on paper). They are only stored as ".POF documents on the organisation's intranet
  • F. Although the scope for each internal audit has been defined, there are no audit criteria defined for the audits carried out to date
  • G. The audit programme mandates auditors must be independent of the areas they audit in order to satisfy the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001:2022
  • H. Audit reports to date have used key performance indicator information to focus solely on the efficiency of ISMS processes
  • I. Top management commitment to the ISMS will not be audited before the certification visit, according to the audit programme
  • J. The audit programme does not take into account the relative importance of information security processes

Answer: B,C,F,H,I,J

Explanation:
Explanation
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an information security management system (ISMS), clause 9.3 requires top management to review the organization's ISMS at planned intervals to ensure its continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness1. Clause 9.2 requires the organization to conduct internal audits at planned intervals to provide information on whether the ISMS conforms to its own requirements and those of ISO/IEC 27001:2022, and is effectively implemented and maintained1. Therefore, when reviewing the audit process and audit findings as a final check before the external certification body arrives, an internal ISMS auditor should verify that these clauses are met in accordance with the audit criteria.
Six of the following statements would cause concern in respect of conformity to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 requirements:
* The audit programme shows management reviews taking place at irregular intervals during the year:
This statement would cause concern because it implies that the organization is not conducting management reviews at planned intervals, as required by clause 9.3. This may affect the ability of top management to ensure the continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the ISMS.
* The audit programme does not take into account the relative importance of information security processes: This statement would cause concern because it implies that the organization is not applying a risk-based approach to determine the audit frequency, methods, scope and criteria, as recommended by ISO 19011:2018, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems2. This may affect the ability of the organization to identify and address the most significant risks and opportunities for its ISMS.
* Although the scope for each internal audit has been defined, there are no audit criteria defined for the audits carried out to date: This statement would cause concern because it implies that the organization is not establishing audit criteria for each internal audit, as required by clause 9.2. Audit criteria are the set of policies, procedures or requirements used as a reference against which audit evidence is compared2.
Without audit criteria, it is not possible to determine whether the ISMS conforms to its own requirements and those of ISO/IEC 27001:2022.
* Audit reports to date have used key performance indicator information to focus solely on the efficiency of ISMS processes: This statement would cause concern because it implies that the organization is not evaluating the effectiveness of ISMS processes, as required by clause 9.1. Effectiveness is the extent to which planned activities are realized and planned results achieved2. Efficiency is the relationship between the result achieved and the resources used2. Both aspects are important for measuring and evaluating ISMS performance and improvement.
* The audit programme does not take into account the results of previous audits: This statement would cause concern because it implies that the organization is not using the results of previous audits as an input for planning and conducting subsequent audits, as recommended by ISO 19011:20182. This may affect the ability of the organization to identify and address any recurring or unresolved issues or nonconformities related to its ISMS.
* Top management commitment to the ISMS will not be audited before the certification visit, according to the audit programme: This statement would cause concern because it implies that the organization is not verifying that top management demonstrates leadership and commitment with respect to its ISMS, as required by clause 5.1. This may affect the ability of top management to ensure that the ISMS policy and objectives are established and compatible with the strategic direction of the organization; that roles, responsibilities and authorities for relevant roles are assigned and communicated; that resources needed for the ISMS are available; that communication about information security matters is established; that continual improvement of the ISMS is promoted; that other relevant management reviews are aligned with those of information security; and that support is provided to other relevant roles1.
The other statements would not cause concern in respect of conformity to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 requirements:
* Audit reports are not held in hardcopy (i.e. on paper). They are only stored as ".POF documents on the organisation's intranet: This statement would not cause concern because it does not imply any nonconformity with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 requirements. The standard does not prescribe any specific format or media for documenting or storing audit reports, as long as they are controlled according to clause 7.5.
* The audit programme mandates auditors must be independent of the areas they audit in order to satisfy the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001:2022: This statement would not cause concern because it does not imply any nonconformity with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 requirements. The standard does not prescribe any specific requirement for auditor independence, as long as the audit is conducted objectively and impartially, in accordance with ISO 19011:20182.
* The audit programme does not reference audit methods or audit responsibilities: This statement would not cause concern because it does not imply any nonconformity with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 requirements. The standard does not prescribe any specific requirement for referencing audit methods or audit responsibilities in the audit programme, as long as they are defined and documented according to ISO 19011:20182.
* The audit process states the results of audits will be made available to 'relevant' managers, not top management: This statement would not cause concern because it does not imply any nonconformity with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 requirements. The standard does not prescribe any specific requirement for communicating the results of audits to top management, as long as they are reported to the relevant parties and used as an input for management review, according to clause 9.3.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems


NEW QUESTION # 118
What is the difference between a restricted and confidential document?

  • A. Restricted - to be shared among named individuals
    Confidential - to be shared across the organization only
  • B. Restricted - to be shared among an authorized group
    Confidential - to be shared among named individuals
  • C. Restricted - to be shared among named individuals
    Confidential - to be shared with friends and family
  • D. Restricted - to be shared among named individuals
    Confidential - to be shared among an authorized group

Answer: D

Explanation:
Explanation
The difference between a restricted and confidential document is that a restricted document is to be shared among named individuals, while a confidential document is to be shared among an authorized group.
Restricted and confidential are examples of information classification levels that indicate the sensitivity and value of information and the degree of protection required for it. Restricted documents contain information that could cause serious damage or harm to the organization or its stakeholders if disclosed to unauthorized persons. Therefore, they should only be accessed by specific individuals who have a legitimate need to know and are authorized by the information owner. Confidential documents contain information that could cause damage or harm to the organization or its stakeholders if disclosed to unauthorized persons. Therefore, they should only be accessed by a defined group of people who have a legitimate need to know and are authorized by the information owner. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 requires the organization to classify information in terms of legal requirements, value, criticality and sensitivity to unauthorized disclosure or modification (see clause A.8.2.1). References: CQI & IRCA Certified ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Training Course, ISO/IEC
27001:2022 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, What is Information Classification?


NEW QUESTION # 119
......

With many advantages such as immediate download, simulation before the real test as well as high degree of privacy, our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor actual exam survives all the ordeals throughout its development and remains one of the best choices for those in preparation for exams. Many people have gained good grades after using our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor real test, so you will also enjoy the good results. Don’t hesitate any more. Time and tide wait for no man. If you really long for recognition and success, you had better choose our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam demo since no other exam demo has better quality than our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor training questions.

Exam ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor PDF: https://www.freepdfdump.top/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-valid-torrent.html

Report this page